Reading about Aaron Alexis' alleged shooting in Washington from both the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, I noticed some immediate points that need addressing.
First,
both news sites are treating Mr. Alexis as though, without a doubt, he
was the one to commit the shootings. WSJ mentions that no one is sure if
he said anything to the police before a shootout happened, and that
officials are still trying to piece together what happened. Now, as much
of the 'evidence' that seems to point to Mr. Alexis committing the
crime, nothing has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt (much of the
evidence seems to be coming from witnesses, which can be hugely
misleading in a panicked situation like this). In fact, initial reports
have witnesses suggesting more than one suspect, due to overlapping
sightings in different areas of the complex. Was Mr. Alexis just an
armed man, trying to find the shooter?
Each news
outlet is so convinced of his guilt, that they have begun digging into
his background, finding evidence of 'mental illness.' This is something I
am sensitive about. My husband has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD) from serving in the Navy. Every time we hear about someone doing
something harmful who happened to be in the military, it seems like
people jump to the assumption of PTSD being a 'cause.' What I would like
to see in the future is for A) news sites waiting to do huge background
histories on a suspect, because doing them before the facts are clear
make things more complicated for the audience. B) Instead of pointing to
PTSD as a cause, why not think of it as a symptom: why did they have
such trouble, and why weren't they helped?
It seems like the media, no matter who is reporting,
looks at an act of violence and automatically begins to dig into the
person(s) background--what psychological distress must they have had to
carry out such an act? Instead, they should be focusing not on the
psychological itself, but what caused it, and if we (citizens) have the
ability to change it. In the last few months, few news sources have
discussed the raise in suicides in the military, and I have yet to read
any in-depth report on the issues within Veteran Affairs and why the
military and the government is failing their troops so badly.
Whether
or not Mr. Alexis had PTSD, or if it had anything to do with 9/11, he
should have undergone psych evaluations before entering the Navy, and
they should have stopped him from being processed if there were serious
questions about the state of his mental health. This is what the news
should be uncovering.
By not discussing the
implications behind mistreatment in the military, I feel like both
articles from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal are missing the
big picture, and missing making this relevant to US citizens
everywhere. We all know someone or are related to someone who has been
in the military. This is an issue that defies race, economic status,
ideology, education, and more. For making front page news and for
devoting so much space to the issue of Mr. Alexis' alleged mass
shooting, I'm left feeling like the journalists missed out on a story
that needs more exploration.
No comments:
Post a Comment